Skip to content

The Woodrow Wilson Bridge EarthCache

Hidden : 3/22/2010
Difficulty:
2 out of 5
Terrain:
2.5 out of 5

Size: Size:   not chosen (not chosen)

Join now to view geocache location details. It's free!

Watch

How Geocaching Works

Related Web Page

Please note Use of geocaching.com services is subject to the terms and conditions in our disclaimer.

Geocache Description:

The new Woodrow Wilson Memorial Bridge spans the Potomac River between Alexandria, Virginia and Oxon Hill, Maryland. There is a 1.1 mile, 12-foot wide multi-use trail that is barrier separated from vehicular traffic traveling the bridge. Parking is available on either side of the bridge.

Woodrow Wilson Bridge

When it was decided that the old Woodrow Wilson bridge needed to be replaced one of the main concerns the engineers had to address before beginning construction was “bridge scour” which is one of the three main causes of bridge failure. It has been estimated that 60% of all bridge failures result from scour and other hydraulic related causes. Bridge scour is the removal of sediment such as sand and rocks from around bridge abutments or piers. Scour, caused by swiftly moving water, can scoop out scour holes, compromising the integrity of a bridge.


Stream channel instability resulting in river erosion and changing angles-of-attack can contribute to bridge scour. Debris can also have a substantial impact on bridge scour in several ways. A build-up of material can reduce the size of the waterway under a bridge causing contraction scour in the channel. A build-up of debris on the abutment can increase the obstruction area and increase local scour. Debris can deflect the water flow, changing the angle of attack, increasing local scour. Debris might also shift the entire channel around the bridge causing increased water flow and scour in another location.


To prevent bridge scour from occurring at the new Wilson Bridge geotechnical engineers conducted extensive analysis of the Potomac riverbed including an Erodibility Index (measurement of potential soil loss). This entailed an assessment of riverbed material properties, hydraulic analysis and scour analysis. Potential scour depths for the 100-year and 500-year floods were also calculated for each of the proposed bridge piers.


Borehole logs, and shear strength and dilatometer (a dilatometer measures the stiffness and shear strength of soil) test results were used to calculate the Erodibility Index of the riverbed. Boreholes, drilled near all of the proposed bridge piers, provided soil property information through descriptions and blow counts (the number of blows required to drive an object into soil). Soil profiles near piers V1 and M1 through M5 have a thick layer of very soft to soft gray to brown silty clay, with some sand and gravel. Below is a layer of Pleistocene era terrace deposits, which are gray and brown, dense to very dense sand with silt, gravel and clay lenses. Finally, the Cretaceous period Potomac group consists of hard gray clay. Soil profiles near piers M6 through M10 and V2 have a thinner layer of soft to very soft alluvial clay, followed by a thin layer of alluvial deposit that consists of loose medium dense brown silty sand. The Pleistocene terrace deposits and Cretaceous Potomac group deposits follow. Dilatometer test results were used to estimate the undrained shear strength of the soil and the residual angle of friction. The shear strength test results were used to confirm the estimates made with the dilatometer test results.



The available stream power was calculated and data was collected for approach velocity, depth of flow and energy slope from a model that was created 5 miles upstream of the construction site.  
This chart shows the results of the Scour Model:



All the information gathered was combined to determine the absolute safest depth for each individual pier, even in the case of a 500-year flood.

There is a sonar scour monitoring system installed on the Wilson Bridge which provides continuous data on streambed elevations, helping to ensure the safety of the traveling public.


Validating the EarthCache find:

1)   Take a picture of yourself with your gps at the posted coordinates which are at the observation area in the center of the bridge and include it with your log.

2)  On the Maryland side of the bridge there is an interpretive sign describing the arches used for the bridge. It reads: 
Redefining the arch
The design of the bridge, selected from among seven competing entries reflects the arch tradition of other Potomac River crossings without actually using the classic arch. True arches create large horizontal forces at the foundations – a problem in the Potomac River where soils are particularly poor. An innovative system of curved, ?- shaped piers is used to transfer the load vertically through soft soil to firmer soils 200 feet below.
Email the letter that represents the shape of the pier as described on the sign.

3) Describe the current in the river whether it is fast or slow. Do you think the water flow is doing any damage to the bridge piers?

 

 

Additional Hints (No hints available.)